1. remove the feature mask parameter from AVRC connection state event, as the AVCTP connection can be initiated by remote device before service discovery to remote device is performed. \
In this case, AVRCP connection state event may not be reported after connection initated by remote device is established.
2. remove ESP_AVRC_CT_MAX_EVT
3. add more documentations to AVRC APIs
Bugfix to prevent a self deleting no affinity task's memory from being freed by the
idle task of the other core before the self deleting no affinity task is able to context
switch out. prvCheckTasksWaitingTermination now checks if the task is still on
pxCurrentTCB before freeing task memory.
This is a wrapper API for creating a Ring Buffer, which ensures that
the ringbuffer can hold the given number of items, each item being of the
same given length.
Signed-off-by: Piyush Shah <piyush@espressif.com>
Useful to check if the next item to receive is wrapped or not.
This is valid only if the ring buffer is initialised with type
RINGBUF_TYPE_ALLOWSPLIT.
This is as per the feature request here:
https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/806
Signed-off-by: Piyush Shah <piyush@espressif.com>
The earlier available API (xRingbufferGetMaxItemSize())just gives
a static max entry value possible for given ring buffer.
There was a feature request for an API which could provide
a real time available buffer size. See below:
https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/806
Signed-off-by: Piyush Shah <piyush@espressif.com>
A couple of typos referencing tx_ring_buf when rx_ring_buf, slv_tx_mux
instead of slv_rx_mux.
Also, I2C_ENTER_CRITICAL()/I2C_EXIT_CRITICAL() usage was not consistent.
Only some of the _set_ functions had them. Most of the _get_ function
had them? It is my understanding that they should be wrapped around
writes, not reads? (I think we still need the lock for reading pairs of consistent values)
Also, the ticks_to_wait timeout handling in i2c_master_cmd_begin() would
not handle integer rollover correctly.
Merges https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/pull/1180
Reported from github:
https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/1312https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/1193
Issues:
1. We used to use event group in the driver, which would cause:
a. longer operation time since the event group are based on FreeRTOS timer.
b. Operation fails if the timer queue is not long enough.
2. There might be some issue with event group, we will still try to provide a small test code in other branch.
modification:
1. use queue instead of event-bit for internal commands
2. use queue overwrite for cmd_done event