Current version of the test is using "git-submodule foreach", which
requires submodules to be initialized. Non-initialized submodules are
ignored. Our CI is not performing submodule initialization, but instead
it only downloads the submodule content in tools/ci/ci_fetch_submodule.py
from cache and copies it into the submodule path.
Since we already know the submodule path from .gitconfig, we can use it
as argument to git-ls-tree and avoid calling git-submodule at all. This
allows to perform the test even if the submodules are not initialization
and also it makes the code simpler.
Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata <frantisek.hrbata@espressif.com>
If CONFIG_SPIRAM_USE_MALLOC is enabled, and cache is disabled when GPIO ISR is triggered,
it would lead to Guru Meditation Error due to "Cache disabled but cached memory region accessed".
Closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/11876
idf.py spawns gdb process within a thread and uses Thread.join() to wait
for the gdb process to finish. As CTRL+C(SIGINT) is used by gdb to interrupt the
running program, we catch the SIGINT while waiting on the gdb to finish,
and try Thread.join() again.
With cpython's commit
commit a22be4943c119fecf5433d999227ff78fc2e5741
Author: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org>
Date: Mon Sep 27 14:20:31 2021 +0200
bpo-45274: Fix Thread._wait_for_tstate_lock() race condition (GH-28532)
this logic doesn't work anymore, because cpython internally marks the
thread as stopped when join() is interrupted with an exception. IMHO
this is broken in cpython and there is a bug report about this
https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/90882. Problem is that
waiting on a thread to finish is based on acquiring a lock. Meaning
join() is waiting on _tstate_lock. If this wait is interrupted, the
above referenced commit adds a logic that checks if the lock is help,
meaning the thread is done and marks the thread as stopped. But there is
no way to tell if the lock was acquired by us running join() or if it's
held by someone else e.g. still by the thread bootstrap code. Meaning
the thread is still running.
I may be missing something, but I don't see any reason why to spawn gdb
process within a thread. This change removes the thread and spawns gdb
directly. Instead waiting on a thread, we wait on the process to finish,
replacing join() with wait() and avoiding this problem.
Closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/11871
Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata <frantisek.hrbata@espressif.com>
1. Fix memory leak caused by assoc IE and retry timer
2. Discard commit frame received at confirmed state in SAE
3. Ignore immediate assoc req received from the station while we are
processing the older one. Fix regression caused by 4cb4faa9
