Compare commits

...

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lucas
1daba83cb9 Revert "Update secure-boot-v2.rst"
This reverts commit d23ac48936.
2024-09-12 15:51:48 +02:00
Lucas
5bac3bb727 Revert "Capitalization fix"
This reverts commit f4d1a14c4e.
2024-09-12 15:51:48 +02:00

View File

@ -610,7 +610,6 @@ Secure Boot Best Practices
--------------
* Keys are processed in a linear order, i.e., key #0, key #1, key #2.
* After revoking a key, all remaining unrevoked keys can be used to sign applications. I.e, if key #1 gets revoked, both keys #0 and key #2 can still be used to sign firmwares.
* Applications should be signed with only one key at a time, to minimize the exposure of unused private keys.
* The bootloader can be signed with multiple keys from the factory.
@ -635,10 +634,6 @@ Secure Boot Best Practices
* A similar approach can also be used to physically re-flash with a new key. For physical re-flashing, the bootloader content can also be changed at the same time.
.. note::
It can be necessary to revoke a key that isn't currently being used. For example: if the running application is still signed with key #0, but key #1 becomes compromised, you should revoke this key using this approach.
The new OTA update should still be signed with key #0, but the API `esp_ota_revoke_secure_boot_public_key(SECURE_BOOT_PUBLIC_KEY_INDEX_[N])` can be used to revoke the key #N. Afterwards all remaining unrevoked keys can be used to sign future applications.
.. _secure-boot-v2-aggressive-key-revocation: