feat(idf.py): Allow adding arguments from file via @filename.txt (#11783) (GitHub PR)
Closes IDFGH-10584 and IDFGH-10539
See merge request espressif/esp-idf!24955
The ticket below reports some very strange behaviour, where
even a simple command like the following
python3 -c "import subprocess; subprocess.run([''])"
actually spawns some process and pass instead of raising
PermissionError. Even though the problem is most probably somewhere
else, not in idf_tools, we may just return early if there is no
command available for get_version().
Closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/11880
Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata <frantisek.hrbata@espressif.com>
When interrupt allocation fails, esp_intr_alloc will now print a
message telling that no free interrupt was found. This message is
then checked in hints.yml, to give a link to the troubleshooting
guide.
Currently ESP_PYTHON is used in the install.sh script, but it's
overwritten in detect_python.sh. This allows to explicitly specify
python binary, which should be used to create venv.
$ ESP_PYTHON=/usr/bin/python3.7 ./install.{sh,fish}
$ ESP_PYTHON=/usr/bin/python3.7 ./export.{sh,fish}
Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata <frantisek.hrbata@espressif.com>
Now the soc interrupts definitions are scattered around in the esp-idf
which are out of sync. Put interrupts definitions in soc/periph_defs.h
(!ESP32) or soc/soc.h(ESP32) together in soc/interrupts.h.
idf.py spawns gdb process within a thread and uses Thread.join() to wait
for the gdb process to finish. As CTRL+C(SIGINT) is used by gdb to interrupt the
running program, we catch the SIGINT while waiting on the gdb to finish,
and try Thread.join() again.
With cpython's commit
commit a22be4943c119fecf5433d999227ff78fc2e5741
Author: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org>
Date: Mon Sep 27 14:20:31 2021 +0200
bpo-45274: Fix Thread._wait_for_tstate_lock() race condition (GH-28532)
this logic doesn't work anymore, because cpython internally marks the
thread as stopped when join() is interrupted with an exception. IMHO
this is broken in cpython and there is a bug report about this
https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/90882. Problem is that
waiting on a thread to finish is based on acquiring a lock. Meaning
join() is waiting on _tstate_lock. If this wait is interrupted, the
above referenced commit adds a logic that checks if the lock is help,
meaning the thread is done and marks the thread as stopped. But there is
no way to tell if the lock was acquired by us running join() or if it's
held by someone else e.g. still by the thread bootstrap code. Meaning
the thread is still running.
I may be missing something, but I don't see any reason why to spawn gdb
process within a thread. This change removes the thread and spawns gdb
directly. Instead waiting on a thread, we wait on the process to finish,
replacing join() with wait() and avoiding this problem.
Closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/11871
Signed-off-by: Frantisek Hrbata <frantisek.hrbata@espressif.com>
