When release sdkconfig is set, substract_poison_overhead() is not inlined
and called from IRAM in multi_heap_get_allocated_size(). By wlways inlining
substract_poison_overhead(), we assure that this problem will not happen.
heap: Fix erroneous value returned by heap_caps_get_allocated_size() when poisoning is enabled (backport v4.3)
See merge request espressif/esp-idf!22190
This commit adds a workaround for the TWAI listen only mode errata which is
present on the ESP32, ESP32-S2, ESP32-S3, and ESP32-C3. twai_get_status_info()
has also been updated to account for the fact that TEC/REC are frozen in
listen only mode.
Errata Description:
When the TWAI controller is put into listen only mode, it should not influence
the TWAI bus in any way (i.e., should never send a dominant bit). However,
on the targets listed above, the TWAI controller will send dominant bits in an
error frame (i.e., active error frame), even if the controller is set to listen
only mode.
Workaround:
We can force the TWAI controller into the error passive state on startup (by
setting the REC to >= 128). Since the TEC/REC are frozen in listen only mode,
the TWAI controller will remain error passive and only send recessive bits
(i.e., passive error frames), thus will not influence the TWAI bus.
Closes https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/9157
When light (or comprehensive) poisoning is enabled, the size requested by the user for allocation
is extended by a few bytes to store the canary header and footer. heap_caps_get_allocated_size() should
return the original size asked by the user (without the additional canary bytes).
test_malloc.c extended with a new test assuring that heap_caps_get_allocated_size() returns the proper size
regardless of the degree of poisoning.
When stack check is enabled, certain functions (sometimes placed in RAM)
are being decorated with stack guards and a call to __stask_chk_fail() in
case ofr stack corruption. For this reason, __stack_chk_fail() must be
placed in RAM too.
Add stack check config in heap tests on all targets to find eventual flash to RAM
calls due to stack checks when running callgraph_check.py
On xtensa architecture, the call to __assert_func uses a reference to __func__ that can
sometimes be placed in flash. Since the __asert_func can be called from functions in IRAM
the check_callgraph script can report an error when checking for invalid calls from IRAM
to flash sections. However, the __asert_func prevents this scenario at runtime so the
check_callgraph script reports a 'flas positive' situation. For this reasson, all references
to __func__$x found prior to a call to __assert_func are droped in the parsing of the rtl files.
