AVRCP connection binds to A2DP in current implementation, despite the two profiles are\
independent according to specification. AVRCP connection is not necessary to set-up \
if A2DP connection fails to establish
In opening state of AVDTP connection, if SDP client fails to get valid A2DP service record\
from peer SDP server, then do not initiate AVDTP connection request
In pevious implementation, A2DP sink will register an A2DP source Stream End Point(SEP) although the SEP is not\
supposed to be used. Now remove the unused SEP for source so that only one role of A2DP can be supported at one
time. Service record in local SDP server only includes at most one service for A2DP sink role or source
As the bluedroid original implmentation of BR/EDR and BLE dual mode about discovery mode,
when set discovery mode for BR/EDR, it will stop ble advertising.
Reference to https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/2306
Problem:
The new API esp_bt_mem_release() that was added freed BTDM data to heap from esp_bt_controller_mem_release().
Now with the BT memory optimization commit ee787085f9,
the BTDM data is optimized and reduced to only 32 bytes which is not sufficient amount to be added to heap.
So, using the API leads to assert saying that the region is too small.
Solution:
Modify heap_caps_add_region_with_caps to return ESP_ERR_INVALID_SIZE in case the range is too small to create a new heap.
Do not assert if return value is ESP_ERR_INVALID_SIZE
This also fixes using API esp_bt_controller_mem_release() with ESP_BT_MODE_BTDM
Signed-off-by: Hrishikesh Dhayagude <hrishi@espressif.com>
res was declared as “bool” so expression
((count == 0) ? A2D_SET_ONE_BIT : A2D_SET_MULTL_BIT)
always evaluated to “true”, and was implicitly converted to
A2D_SET_ONE_BIT.
1. after memory release MR merged, due to the get acl number condition is not completed, it will cause get acl number value incorrect
2. It may cause set Security Mode (BR/EDR) enable failed
Multiple modules register their callback BTA_GATTS_AppRegister().
If any of the callbacks do not free the allocated pointer in
BTA_GATTS_CONF_EVT event, then this can result in memory leak.
So, free the pointer after the callback function is called and remove
the calls to free in the callback functions as it is now not required
Signed-off-by: Hrishikesh Dhayagude <hrishi@espressif.com>
This is just a quick glance at all the header files exposed to the
users from cleanup point of view.
Signed-off-by: Hrishikesh Dhayagude <hrishi@espressif.com>
Calling `esp_bt_controller_mem_release` or `esp_bt_mem_release` might result in exception if any of the regions returned to heap are empty. This happens usually if BT/BLE is enabled, but not used/linked in the final firmware.
1. BLE only with 9(max) connection will decrease 3K DRAM
2. BR/EDR only with 7(max) connection will decrease 16K DRAM
3. Any of BLE or BR/EDR connection number decrease will also decrease DRAM consumption
4. Decrease one BLE connection will save about 1KB DRAM
5. Decrease one BR/EDR ACL connection will save about 1.2KB DRAM
6. Decrease one BR/EDR SCO/eSCO will save 2KB DRAM.
7. fix some definition and kconfig
8. remove 1.2k of vhci tx cache and make .bss & .data to heap about 1.4K
9. modify BT Reserved Memory size and modify example to support new bt kconfig
1. Add the 100 times test when the private key is generated by the random number;
2. Add the bt components to the unit-test-app/config directory.
3. Added the bt unit test case to CI.
No longer necessary to keep all reserved addresses in 'soc'.
Means 'soc' does not need to know about 'bt', for example.
Also means that Bluetooth can be enabled in config without any memory being reserved for BT
controller. Only if code calling the BT controller is linked in, will this memory be reserved...
1. when one task do deinit/init/disable/enable, especially different cpu
core, it may cause controller crash in ISR handler
2. fix while BLE is scanning, bluetooth controller is disabled cause BLE
scan is not abort.
1. Modify esp_bt_controller_mem_release() to release BTDM BSS and Data to heap if
ESP_BT_MODE_BTDM mode is passed to it
2. Add a new API esp_bt_mem_release() which internally calls
esp_bt_controller_mem_release() with the provided mode and then if mode
is ESP_BT_MODE_BTDM, releases BT BSS and Data to heap.
Background:
For Wi-Fi and BT/BLE applications, for e.g. the usecase is like when
Bluetooth is used for provisioning and once the device is connected to the Wi-Fi
AP, we can turn off Bluetooth completely. In such scenarios, it should be possible to
reclaim all the memory of Bluetooth. Although, currently this does not
happen.
Experiment:
Made the following modifications to examples/bluetooth/gatt_server :
1. Added support of simple_wifi to it
2. Moved all the bluetooth related code under CONFIG_BT_ENABLED config
option
3. Calculated the free heap in 2 similar scenarios:
i. Disabled BT (CONFIG_BT_ENABLED undefined) and checked the free
heap after STA connected
ii. Kept BT enabled and disabled it after STA connected and checked
the free heap
Ideally, the numbers for i., ii. above should have been similar. But
there was a delta of almost 30-31K. (i. > ii.)
4. Through make size-components checked the common BSS for libbta.a and libbtdm_app.a
and found it to be almost 30K. Data is around 1K
Solution:
1. Modified the linker script to mark the BSS and Data for these libraries and
free it when ESP_BT_MODE_BTDM mode is passed to mem release APIs.
2. Verified that the free heap is comparable for i. and ii. above.
Note: It is known that once this is done, Bluetooth can only be used
again post reboot.
Signed-off-by: Hrishikesh Dhayagude <hrishi@espressif.com>
1. fix BLE connection missing in coex mode
2. modify other parameters to make coex priority more reasonable
3. fix modem sleep procedure trap cause Wifi disable RF when BT is
working. Such cause that BR/EDR is difficult to be connected, BLE
connection stability decrease and so on.
4. modify BR/EDR coexist duration to imrove BR/EDR connect success
ratio.
5. Due to the hardware coexist bug, BLE scan interval/window should
be less than 0x100(about 160ms). Therefore, it will cause BLE cannot
scan any advertising packet while WiFi have higher priority
behaviour(such like RX beacon, scan, TX/RX VO packets and etc.).
