mirror of
https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf.git
synced 2024-10-05 20:47:46 -04:00
Merge branch 'bugfix/btdm_fix_two_bugs_about_pairing_v3.1' into 'release/v3.1'
components/bt: Fix two bugs about pairing(backport 3.1) See merge request idf/esp-idf!3996
This commit is contained in:
commit
e1dcd81c18
@ -2642,9 +2642,7 @@ static UINT8 bta_dm_authorize_cback (BD_ADDR bd_addr, DEV_CLASS dev_class, BD_NA
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#if (BTM_LOCAL_IO_CAPS != BTM_IO_CAP_NONE)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*******************************************************************************
|
/*******************************************************************************
|
||||||
**
|
**
|
||||||
** Function bta_dm_pinname_cback
|
** Function bta_dm_pinname_cback
|
||||||
@ -2701,6 +2699,7 @@ static UINT8 bta_dm_authorize_cback (BD_ADDR bd_addr, DEV_CLASS dev_class, BD_NA
|
|||||||
bta_dm_cb.p_sec_cback(event, &sec_event);
|
bta_dm_cb.p_sec_cback(event, &sec_event);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
#endif //(BTM_LOCAL_IO_CAPS != BTM_IO_CAP_NONE)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*******************************************************************************
|
/*******************************************************************************
|
||||||
**
|
**
|
||||||
@ -2720,18 +2719,6 @@ static UINT8 bta_dm_pin_cback (BD_ADDR bd_addr, DEV_CLASS dev_class, BD_NAME bd_
|
|||||||
return BTM_NOT_AUTHORIZED;
|
return BTM_NOT_AUTHORIZED;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* If the device name is not known, save bdaddr and devclass and initiate a name request */
|
|
||||||
if (bd_name[0] == 0) {
|
|
||||||
bta_dm_cb.pin_evt = BTA_DM_PIN_REQ_EVT;
|
|
||||||
bdcpy(bta_dm_cb.pin_bd_addr, bd_addr);
|
|
||||||
BTA_COPY_DEVICE_CLASS(bta_dm_cb.pin_dev_class, dev_class);
|
|
||||||
if ((BTM_ReadRemoteDeviceName(bd_addr, bta_dm_pinname_cback, BT_TRANSPORT_BR_EDR)) == BTM_CMD_STARTED) {
|
|
||||||
return BTM_CMD_STARTED;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
APPL_TRACE_WARNING(" bta_dm_pin_cback() -> Failed to start Remote Name Request ");
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
bdcpy(sec_event.pin_req.bd_addr, bd_addr);
|
bdcpy(sec_event.pin_req.bd_addr, bd_addr);
|
||||||
BTA_COPY_DEVICE_CLASS(sec_event.pin_req.dev_class, dev_class);
|
BTA_COPY_DEVICE_CLASS(sec_event.pin_req.dev_class, dev_class);
|
||||||
BCM_STRNCPY_S((char *)sec_event.pin_req.bd_name, sizeof(BD_NAME), (char *)bd_name, (BD_NAME_LEN - 1));
|
BCM_STRNCPY_S((char *)sec_event.pin_req.bd_name, sizeof(BD_NAME), (char *)bd_name, (BD_NAME_LEN - 1));
|
||||||
|
@ -250,10 +250,10 @@ static void start_up(void)
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (simple_pairing_supported) {
|
|
||||||
response = AWAIT_COMMAND(packet_factory->make_set_event_mask(&CLASSIC_EVENT_MASK));
|
response = AWAIT_COMMAND(packet_factory->make_set_event_mask(&CLASSIC_EVENT_MASK));
|
||||||
packet_parser->parse_generic_command_complete(response);
|
packet_parser->parse_generic_command_complete(response);
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#if (BTM_SCO_HCI_INCLUDED == TRUE)
|
#if (BTM_SCO_HCI_INCLUDED == TRUE)
|
||||||
response = AWAIT_COMMAND(packet_factory->make_write_sync_flow_control_enable(1));
|
response = AWAIT_COMMAND(packet_factory->make_write_sync_flow_control_enable(1));
|
||||||
|
@ -5030,14 +5030,7 @@ void btm_sec_pin_code_request (UINT8 *p_bda)
|
|||||||
memcpy (p_cb->connecting_bda, p_bda, BD_ADDR_LEN);
|
memcpy (p_cb->connecting_bda, p_bda, BD_ADDR_LEN);
|
||||||
memcpy (p_cb->connecting_dc, p_dev_rec->dev_class, DEV_CLASS_LEN);
|
memcpy (p_cb->connecting_dc, p_dev_rec->dev_class, DEV_CLASS_LEN);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Check if the name is known */
|
|
||||||
/* Even if name is not known we might not be able to get one */
|
|
||||||
/* this is the case when we are already getting something from the */
|
|
||||||
/* device, so HCI level is flow controlled */
|
|
||||||
/* Also cannot send remote name request while paging, i.e. connection is not completed */
|
|
||||||
if (p_dev_rec->sec_flags & BTM_SEC_NAME_KNOWN) {
|
|
||||||
BTM_TRACE_EVENT ("btm_sec_pin_code_request going for callback\n");
|
BTM_TRACE_EVENT ("btm_sec_pin_code_request going for callback\n");
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
btm_cb.pairing_flags |= BTM_PAIR_FLAGS_PIN_REQD;
|
btm_cb.pairing_flags |= BTM_PAIR_FLAGS_PIN_REQD;
|
||||||
if (p_cb->api.p_pin_callback) {
|
if (p_cb->api.p_pin_callback) {
|
||||||
(*p_cb->api.p_pin_callback) (p_bda, p_dev_rec->dev_class, p_dev_rec->sec_bd_name,
|
(*p_cb->api.p_pin_callback) (p_bda, p_dev_rec->dev_class, p_dev_rec->sec_bd_name,
|
||||||
@ -5045,28 +5038,6 @@ void btm_sec_pin_code_request (UINT8 *p_bda)
|
|||||||
: (p_dev_rec->p_cur_service->security_flags
|
: (p_dev_rec->p_cur_service->security_flags
|
||||||
& BTM_SEC_IN_MIN_16_DIGIT_PIN));
|
& BTM_SEC_IN_MIN_16_DIGIT_PIN));
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
} else {
|
|
||||||
BTM_TRACE_EVENT ("btm_sec_pin_code_request going for remote name\n");
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* We received PIN code request for the device with unknown name */
|
|
||||||
/* it is not user friendly just to ask for the PIN without name */
|
|
||||||
/* try to get name at first */
|
|
||||||
if (!btsnd_hcic_rmt_name_req (p_dev_rec->bd_addr,
|
|
||||||
HCI_PAGE_SCAN_REP_MODE_R1,
|
|
||||||
HCI_MANDATARY_PAGE_SCAN_MODE, 0)) {
|
|
||||||
p_dev_rec->sec_flags |= BTM_SEC_NAME_KNOWN;
|
|
||||||
p_dev_rec->sec_bd_name[0] = 'f';
|
|
||||||
p_dev_rec->sec_bd_name[1] = '0';
|
|
||||||
BTM_TRACE_ERROR ("can not send rmt_name_req?? fake a name and call callback\n");
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
btm_cb.pairing_flags |= BTM_PAIR_FLAGS_PIN_REQD;
|
|
||||||
if (p_cb->api.p_pin_callback)
|
|
||||||
(*p_cb->api.p_pin_callback) (p_bda, p_dev_rec->dev_class,
|
|
||||||
p_dev_rec->sec_bd_name, (p_dev_rec->p_cur_service == NULL) ? FALSE
|
|
||||||
: (p_dev_rec->p_cur_service->security_flags
|
|
||||||
& BTM_SEC_IN_MIN_16_DIGIT_PIN));
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user