mirror of
https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf.git
synced 2024-10-05 20:47:46 -04:00
Delete the option BLE ADV priority high
Fix controller task watchdog in Wi-Fi test
This commit is contained in:
parent
906dbd262e
commit
62a4a0dcaf
@ -342,21 +342,6 @@ menu Bluetooth
|
||||
If you set `BLE_ADV_REPORT_DISCARD_THRSHOLD` to a small value or printf every adv lost event, it
|
||||
may cause adv packets lost more.
|
||||
|
||||
menuconfig BTDM_COEX_BT_OPTIONS
|
||||
bool "Coexistence Bluetooth Side Options"
|
||||
depends on SW_COEXIST_ENABLE
|
||||
default n
|
||||
help
|
||||
Options of Bluetooth Side of WiFi and bluetooth coexistence.
|
||||
|
||||
config BTDM_COEX_BLE_ADV_HIGH_PRIORITY
|
||||
bool "Improve BLE ADV priority for WiFi & BLE coexistence"
|
||||
depends on BTDM_COEX_BT_OPTIONS
|
||||
default n
|
||||
help
|
||||
Improve BLE ADV coexistence priority to make it better performance.
|
||||
For example, BLE mesh need to enable this option to improve BLE adv performance.
|
||||
|
||||
endmenu
|
||||
|
||||
menuconfig BLUEDROID_ENABLED
|
||||
|
@ -239,7 +239,6 @@ extern uint8_t coex_schm_curr_period_get(void);
|
||||
extern void * coex_schm_curr_phase_get(void);
|
||||
extern int coex_wifi_channel_get(uint8_t *primary, uint8_t *secondary);
|
||||
extern int coex_register_wifi_channel_change_callback(void *cb);
|
||||
extern void coex_ble_adv_priority_high_set(bool high);
|
||||
|
||||
extern char _bss_start_btdm;
|
||||
extern char _bss_end_btdm;
|
||||
@ -1430,12 +1429,6 @@ esp_err_t esp_bt_controller_init(esp_bt_controller_config_t *cfg)
|
||||
goto error;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_BTDM_COEX_BLE_ADV_HIGH_PRIORITY
|
||||
coex_ble_adv_priority_high_set(true);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
coex_ble_adv_priority_high_set(false);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
btdm_controller_status = ESP_BT_CONTROLLER_STATUS_INITED;
|
||||
|
||||
return ESP_OK;
|
||||
|
@ -1 +1 @@
|
||||
Subproject commit 8ccb84838d882f1139e92080e36d01e487d39d6a
|
||||
Subproject commit e81ca744d7f36773c02dc57d4a61af6fca33f91c
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user