diff --git a/components/esp_driver_i2c/i2c_master.c b/components/esp_driver_i2c/i2c_master.c
index 09b0b17706..bf7e1f8aa5 100644
--- a/components/esp_driver_i2c/i2c_master.c
+++ b/components/esp_driver_i2c/i2c_master.c
@@ -944,9 +944,6 @@ esp_err_t i2c_new_master_bus(const i2c_master_bus_config_t *bus_config, i2c_mast
     i2c_master->base->sda_num = bus_config->sda_io_num;
     i2c_master->base->pull_up_enable = bus_config->flags.enable_internal_pullup;
 
-    if (i2c_master->base->pull_up_enable == false) {
-        ESP_LOGW(TAG, "Please check pull-up resistances whether be connected properly. Otherwise unexpected behavior would happen. For more detailed information, please read docs");
-    }
     ESP_GOTO_ON_ERROR(i2c_param_master_config(i2c_master->base, bus_config), err, TAG, "i2c configure parameter failed");
 
     if (!i2c_master->base->is_lp_i2c) {
@@ -985,7 +982,6 @@ esp_err_t i2c_new_master_bus(const i2c_master_bus_config_t *bus_config, i2c_mast
     xSemaphoreGive(i2c_master->bus_lock_mux);
     // Initialize the queue
     if (bus_config->trans_queue_depth) {
-        ESP_LOGW(TAG, "Please note i2c asynchronous is only used for specific scenario currently. It's experimental for other users because user cannot get bus error from API. And It's not compatible with ``i2c_master_probe``. If user makes sure there won't be any error on bus and tested with no problem, this message can be ignored.");
         i2c_master->async_trans = true;
         i2c_master->sent_all = true;
         i2c_master->trans_finish = true;