mirror of
https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf.git
synced 2024-10-05 20:47:46 -04:00
docs: Explain revocation of unused but compromised keys
Explain the revocation of unused but compromised keys. docs: Apply updates from code review Add some nitpicks from AdityaHPatwardhan. Co-authored-by: Aditya Patwardhan <aditya.patwardhan@espressif.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ee41fc8a4c
commit
39d0eacde4
@ -610,6 +610,7 @@ Secure Boot Best Practices
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
* Keys are processed in a linear order, i.e., key #0, key #1, key #2.
|
||||
* When a key is revoked, all remaining unrevoked keys can still be used to sign applications. For instance, if key #1 is revoked, keys such as key #0 and key #2 will remain valid for signing the application.
|
||||
* Applications should be signed with only one key at a time, to minimize the exposure of unused private keys.
|
||||
* The bootloader can be signed with multiple keys from the factory.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -634,6 +635,11 @@ Secure Boot Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
* A similar approach can also be used to physically re-flash with a new key. For physical re-flashing, the bootloader content can also be changed at the same time.
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
|
||||
It may be necessary to revoke a key that isn't currently being used.
|
||||
For example, if the active application is signed with key #0, but key #1 becomes compromised, you should revoke key #1 by using the above approach. The new OTA update should continue to be signed with key #0, and the API `esp_ota_revoke_secure_boot_public_key(SECURE_BOOT_PUBLIC_KEY_INDEX_[N])` can be used to revoke the key #N (N would be 1 in this case). After revoking, all remaining unrevoked keys can still be used to sign future applications.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _secure-boot-v2-aggressive-key-revocation:
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user