Update README.md

This commit is contained in:
nopnop2002 2024-03-26 06:03:20 +09:00
parent 134cf33de0
commit ed4ba762ec

View File

@ -37,10 +37,6 @@ __Wire cables should be as short as possible.__
|ESP32C6@160|37.1|38.2||
|ESP32H2@96|34.6|36.4||
__Note:__
Please note that this benchmark results from ESP-IDF V5.2.
Your results may vary if you use other versions.
ESP32C6 gave the fastest results when the CPU frequency was 160MHz (120MHz or 96MHz for some SoCs).
ESP32C3 is the next fastest.
There are only a few differences between ESP32C6 and ESP32C3.
@ -70,11 +66,6 @@ __Wire cables should be as short as possible.__
|ESP32C6@160|98.2|164.9|268.0|331.9|369.6|399.8||
|ESP32H2@96|86.6|139.1|202.8|235.5|256.1|267.9||
__Note:__
Please note that this benchmark results from ESP-IDF V5.2.
Your results may vary if you use other versions.
ESP32C6 gave the fastest results when the CPU frequency was 160MHz (120MHz or 96MHz for some SoCs).
ESP32C3 is the next fastest.
There are only a few differences between ESP32C6 and ESP32C3.
@ -96,3 +87,8 @@ ESP32S2 gave the fastest results when the CPU frequency was 240MHz.
![spi_240MHz-6MHz](https://github.com/nopnop2002/esp-idf-ssd1306/assets/6020549/79b63037-b755-4ea2-9d8f-7ba5036ceb46)
![spi_240MHz-8MHz](https://github.com/nopnop2002/esp-idf-ssd1306/assets/6020549/081e4d15-14db-4256-91d2-19f48595648b)
![spi_240MHz-10MHz](https://github.com/nopnop2002/esp-idf-ssd1306/assets/6020549/a324bfed-63c1-42e9-a005-2cca71e9057d)
__Note:__
Please note that this benchmark results from ESP-IDF V5.2.
Your results may vary if you use other versions.